[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B6F834E.4010801@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:21:50 +0800
From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@...acom.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, nhorman@...driver.com,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port
numbers
Octavian Purdila wrote:
> On Friday 05 February 2010 06:45:38 you wrote:
>
>> Again, using bitmap algorithm is not a problem and it's better, the
>> problem is sysctl interface, how would you plan to interact with users
>> via sysctl/proc if you use bitmap to handle this? I would like to hear
>> more details about this.
>>
>
> We could use something like positive values for setting and negative for reset
> (e.g. 3 would set the port in the bitmap and -3 would reset it).
Hmm, then how do you output the info of those ports? Arrays of bitmaps?
>
> But we would need new sysctl and proc handlers to handle the bitmap case (e.g.
> sysctl_bitmap, proc_dobitmap_minmax).
Maybe.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists