[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100205061335.b664aa20.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 06:13:35 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, Philip Langdale <philipl@...rt.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jorg Schummer <ext-jorg.2.schummer@...ia.com>,
linux-pm <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MMC: fix hang if card was removed during suspend and
unsafe resume was enabled
On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:31:42 +0200 Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 16:09 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 01:18:15 +0200 Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Currently removal of the card leads to del_disk called indirectly by mmc core.
> > > This function expects userspace to be running, which isn't when .resume is called
> > >
> > > Fix that by removing the code that did that in mmc_resume_host. It is possible
> > > because card detection logic will kick it later and remove the card.
> >
> > I don't really understand. The above implies that to trigger this bug,
> > one needs to physically remove the card during a resume operation. ie:
> > a human-vs-computer race. Sounds unlikely?
> >
> > So... exactly what steps does the user need to take to trigger this
>
> Sorry for describing this poorly.
> The steps are:
>
> -> Have a kernel with CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME
> -> Insert MMC/SD card
> -> Suspend/hibernate the system
> -> While system is hibernated/suspended pull the card off
> -> Resume the system
> -> Hang
>
>
> if CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME is set, mmc core allows the user to
> suspend/resume the card normally assuming he won't change the card or
> modify it in another system. The former case is actually handled quite
> well.
>
> if CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME isn't set, it removes the card during
> suspend, and I now think (and will test) that this will still hang the
> system this time on suspend.
>
> Maybe we can make del_disk behave well if called with userspace frozen?
> After all if user calls it, very likely that hardware is absent thus
> there is no point in syncing (which I think triggers the hang)....
>
There is no del_disk in the kernel. Let's be more specific (and
accurate!) about the hang. I assume it's
mmc_remove_card->device_del->kobject_uevent?
Yes, I'd have thought that it would be a good idea for the
kobject_uevent code (or lower, in call_usermodehelper) to take avoiding
action if userspace is frozen. However such action would probably
involve doing a WARN_ON() too, so we'd still need MMC changes to avoid
that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists