[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100205163024.GC2736@jgarrett.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:30:24 -0600
From: Jeff Garrett <jeff@...rrett.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: acpi_idle: Very idle Core i7 machine never enters C3
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 03:10:38PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Tue 2010-01-26 02:47:40, Jeff Garrett wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was trying to chase down a theory that my desktop machine (a core i7)
> > is running warm (the fan sounds like it's at full speed all the time,
> > and I think it's not always acted this way -- hence the theory).
> >
> > powertop is never showing it spending any time in C3...
> >
> > I compiled a kernel without USB/sound/radeon, and ran without X. I was
> > able to get the wakeups/sec down below 20, but no time is spent in C3.
>
> > This may be a complete red herring, but I added some printk logic to
> > acpi_idle_bm_check(), and it is getting called often, but bm_status is
> > always 1. [I infer from this that the idle logic is trying to go into
> > C3, but this check is stopping it... Unless I misread something.]
> >
> > Is this expected behavior or is this a legitimate problem?
> >
> > How might I investigate this further?
>
> DMA keeps system awake? Possibly USB?
X is not running. USB is not enabled at all (CONFIG_USB_SUPPORT is not
set), and likewise for sound & drm. What could be doing the DMA? :)
If there is DMA, it could be disk or network related. However, I
find it hard to believe that this activity is so constant on a nearly
idle system... Of course, I haven't thought of a way to test this yet.
Attaching my config & dmesg of my latest try.
Thanks,
-Jeff
View attachment "config" of type "text/plain" (80091 bytes)
View attachment "dmesg" of type "text/plain" (61489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists