[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1265628948.1853.43.camel@laptop>
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:35:48 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Suresh B Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
Arun Bharadwaj <arun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: sched_mc_powersavings broken on pre-Nehalem x86 platforms
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 15:35 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
> Fix for sched_mc_powersavigs for pre-Nehalem platforms.
> Child sched domain should clear SD_PREFER_SIBLING if parent will have
> SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE because they are contradicting.
>
> Sets the flags correctly based on sched_mc_power_savings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 6550415..ef6b7cd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -866,7 +866,10 @@ static inline int sd_balance_for_mc_power(void)
> if (sched_smt_power_savings)
> return SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE;
>
> - return SD_PREFER_SIBLING;
> + if (!sched_mc_power_savings)
> + return SD_PREFER_SIBLING;
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static inline int sd_balance_for_package_power(void)
>
Looks good, thanks!
What's the status of getting rid of sched_{mc,smt}_power_savings?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists