linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the omap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1265629385.2433.29.camel@tubuntu.research.nokia.com>
Date:	Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:43:05 +0200
From:	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...ia.com>
To:	ext Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav@...com>,
	"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the omap_dss2 tree with the omap
 tree

Hi,

On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 11:57 +0100, ext Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Tomi,
> 
> On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:29:06 +0200 Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...ia.com> wrote:
> >
> > > P.S. Tomi, this omap_dss2 commit only has your Acked-by not Signed-off-by.
> > 
> > Hmm, do you mean there's something wrong with that, or "jfyi"? Aren't I,
> > as a subsys maintainer, supposed to ack the patches?
> 
> If a patch goes through your tree, you are supposed to add a Signed-off-by
> line.  See Documentation/SubmittingPatches section called "Sign your
> work".

So it is. Thanks for pointing this out, I'll change the acks to
signed-offs.

 Tomi



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/