[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B7128EF.4010503@petalogix.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 10:20:47 +0100
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...alogix.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
CC: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
microblaze-uclinux@...e.uq.edu.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] of/gpio: Introduce of_put_gpio(), add ref counting
for OF GPIO chips
Michal Simek wrote:
> Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>> OF GPIO infrastructure is using dynamic GPIO bases, so it is possible
>> that of_get_gpio()'s returned GPIO number will be no longer valid, or
>> worse, it may point to an unexpected GPIO controller.
>
> I am not able to apply this last patch.
>
> $ git-am < \[PATCH\ 3_3\]\ of_gpio\:\ Introduce\ of_put_gpio\(\)\,\ add\
> ref\ counting\ for\ OF\ GPIO\ chips.eml
> Applying of/gpio: Introduce of_put_gpio(), add ref counting for OF GPIO
> chips
> error: patch failed: drivers/of/gpio.c:254
> error: drivers/of/gpio.c: patch does not apply
> Patch failed at 0001.
> When you have resolved this problem run "git-am --resolved".
> If you would prefer to skip this patch, instead run "git-am --skip".
>
> Below is my git-log which patches I applied.
> Please fix it.
I see where the problem is. I applied Andrews patch too that's why I am
getting the fault above.
Anyway will be good to fix it. Will test gpio and let you know.
Michal
>
> Thanks,
> Michal
>
> 99d5baaa53562252a896080bf426b4ae71a5e55f of: Introduce safe accessors
> for node->data
> df6d71af9c0691716ad8a368609a7e26a8dfdaa0 of platforms: Move common
> static initialization to of_node_init()
> 566969302a9dd70ce8a07c978bd08804ee73d0d6 powerpc/mcu_mpc8349emitx:
> Remove OF GPIO handling stuff
> 816932ea74919867c1f899758ea4cdd138145453 of/gpio: Implement GPIOLIB
> notifier hooks
> 3ea035a9e0f446b2b9cd9bacf73395a0c80ae3e9 of/gpio: Implement GPIOLIB
> notifier hooks
> b7b96a9ee215c800476d002b06a338c4499f3813 of/gpio: Add support for
> two-stage registration for the of_gpio_chips
> 15678cc192c03a2b1bbb36da18ff2a3fe2d78897 gpiolib: Introduce chip
> addition/removal notifier
> deb0c98c7f6035d47a247e548384517a955314a5 Merge branch 'for-2.6.33' of
> git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux
>
>
>
>>
>> This scenario is possible:
>>
>> driver A: driver B: driver C:
>> --------- --------- ---------
>> gpiochip_add()
>> gpio = of_get_gpio()
>> gpiochip_remove()
>> gpiochip_add()
>> gpio_request(gpio);
>> gpio_set_value(gpio);
>>
>> That is, driver A assumes that it is working with GPIO from driver B,
>> but in practice it may disappear and driver C will take its GPIO base
>> number, so it will provide the same GPIO numbers.
>>
>> With this patch that situation is no longer possible. Though drivers
>> will need to learn to put GPIOs back, so that GPIO controllers could
>> be removed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/of/gpio.c | 82
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>> include/linux/of_gpio.h | 5 +++
>> 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/gpio.c b/drivers/of/gpio.c
>> index 9d8df77..e94c5c8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/gpio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/of/gpio.c
>> @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@
>> * Returns GPIO number to use with Linux generic GPIO API, or one of
>> the errno
>> * value on the error condition. If @flags is not NULL the function
>> also fills
>> * in flags for the GPIO.
>> + *
>> + * Remeber to put the GPIO back using of_put_gpio() call.
>> */
>> int of_get_gpio_flags(struct device_node *np, int index,
>> enum of_gpio_flags *flags)
>> @@ -46,6 +48,8 @@ int of_get_gpio_flags(struct device_node *np, int
>> index,
>> goto err0;
>> }
>>
>> + spin_lock(&gc->data_lock);
>> +
>> of_gc = gc->data;
>> if (!of_gc) {
>> pr_debug("%s: gpio controller %s isn't registered\n",
>> @@ -72,15 +76,62 @@ int of_get_gpio_flags(struct device_node *np, int
>> index,
>> goto err1;
>>
>> ret += of_gc->chip->base;
>> +
>> + if (!try_module_get(of_gc->chip->owner)) {
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + goto err1;
>> + }
>> +
>> + of_gc->refcnt++;
>> err1:
>> + spin_unlock(&gc->data_lock);
>> +
>> of_node_put(gc);
>> err0:
>> pr_debug("%s exited with status %d\n", __func__, ret);
>> +
>> return ret;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_get_gpio_flags);
>>
>> /**
>> + * of_put_gpio - Put a GPIO back to the OF subsystem
>> + * @np: device node of the GPIO owner
>> + * @index: index of the GPIO
>> + */
>> +static inline void of_put_gpio(struct device_node *np, int index)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> + struct device_node *gc;
>> + struct of_gpio_chip *of_gc;
>> +
>> + ret = of_parse_phandles_with_args(np, "gpios", "#gpio-cells", index,
>> + &gc, NULL);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + pr_debug("%s: can't parse gpios property\n", __func__);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + spin_lock(&gc->data_lock);
>> +
>> + of_gc = gc->data;
>> + if (!of_gc) {
>> + pr_debug("%s: gpio controller %s isn't registered\n",
>> + np->full_name, gc->full_name);
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (of_gc->refcnt)
>> + of_gc->refcnt--;
>> + else
>> + WARN_ON(1);
>> +
>> + module_put(of_gc->chip->owner);
>> +err:
>> + spin_unlock(&gc->data_lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> * of_gpio_count - Count GPIOs for a device
>> * @np: device node to count GPIOs for
>> *
>> @@ -254,11 +305,7 @@ static int of_gpiochip_register_simple(struct
>> gpio_chip *chip,
>> struct device_node *np)
>> {
>> struct of_gpio_chip *of_gc;
>> -
>> - if (np->data) {
>> - WARN_ON(1);
>> - return -EBUSY;
>> - }
>> + int ret;
>>
>> of_gc = kzalloc(sizeof(*of_gc), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!of_gc)
>> @@ -267,10 +314,12 @@ static int of_gpiochip_register_simple(struct
>> gpio_chip *chip,
>> of_gc->gpio_cells = 2;
>> of_gc->xlate = of_gpio_simple_xlate;
>> of_gc->chip = chip;
>> - np->data = of_gc;
>> - of_node_get(np);
>>
>> - return 0;
>> + ret = of_node_set_data(np, of_gc);
>> + if (ret)
>> + kfree(of_gc);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_gpiochip_register_simple);
>>
>> @@ -286,17 +335,26 @@ static int of_gpiochip_unregister(struct
>> gpio_chip *chip,
>> struct device_node *np)
>> {
>> struct of_gpio_chip *of_gc = np->data;
>> + int ret = 0;
>>
>> if (!of_gc || of_gc->chip != chip) {
>> WARN_ON(1);
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> - np->data = NULL;
>> - kfree(of_gc);
>> - of_node_put(np);
>> + spin_lock(&np->data_lock);
>>
>> - return 0;
>> + if (of_gc->refcnt)
>> + ret = -EBUSY;
>> + else
>> + of_node_release_data_unlocked(np);
>> +
>> + spin_unlock(&np->data_lock);
>> +
>> + if (!ret)
>> + kfree(of_gc);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> }
>>
>> static int of_gpio_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long msg,
>> diff --git a/include/linux/of_gpio.h b/include/linux/of_gpio.h
>> index c74cb37..aca7ab1 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/of_gpio.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/of_gpio.h
>> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ enum of_gpio_flags {
>> struct of_gpio_chip {
>> struct gpio_chip gc; /* legacy, don't use for a new code */
>> struct gpio_chip *chip;
>> + unsigned int refcnt;
>> int gpio_cells;
>> int (*xlate)(struct of_gpio_chip *of_gc, struct device_node *np,
>> const void *gpio_spec, enum of_gpio_flags *flags);
>> @@ -83,6 +84,8 @@ static inline int of_get_gpio_flags(struct
>> device_node *np, int index,
>> return -ENOSYS;
>> }
>>
>> +static inline void of_put_gpio(struct device_node *np, int index) {}
>> +
>> static inline unsigned int of_gpio_count(struct device_node *np)
>> {
>> return 0;
>> @@ -97,6 +100,8 @@ static inline unsigned int of_gpio_count(struct
>> device_node *np)
>> *
>> * Returns GPIO number to use with Linux generic GPIO API, or one of
>> the errno
>> * value on the error condition.
>> + *
>> + * Remeber to put the GPIO back using of_put_gpio() call.
>> */
>> static inline int of_get_gpio(struct device_node *np, int index)
>> {
>
>
--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
PetaLogix - Linux Solutions for a Reconfigurable World
w: www.petalogix.com p: +61-7-30090663,+42-0-721842854 f: +61-7-30090663
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists