[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100209115213.dc85e4a5.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 11:52:13 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/35] x86: print out for RAM buffer
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:32:20 -0800
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> so could check that early in bootlog
>
> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 3 +++
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> index a966b75..dfb1689 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> @@ -1429,6 +1429,9 @@ void __init e820_reserve_resources_late(void)
> end = MAX_RESOURCE_SIZE;
> if (start >= end)
> continue;
> + printk(KERN_DEBUG "reserve RAM buffer: %016Lx - %016Lx ",
> + (unsigned long long) start,
> + (unsigned long long) end);
> reserve_region_with_split(&iomem_resource, start, end,
> "RAM buffer");
> }
The typecasts for printing u64's are unneeded within x86 code. In fact
I think they're now unneeded on all architectures.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists