[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201002150012.25572.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:12:25 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: James Cloos <cloos@...loos.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Regression] Filesystem I/O is CPU-bound in rc7 and rc8
On Sunday 14 February 2010, James Cloos wrote:
> Sometime between rc6 and rc7 all filesystem I/O started using 100% CPU,
> usually on the order of 60% sys, 40% user.
>
> I've tried this with each of ext4, jfs and btrfs filesystems. All show
> the same issue.
>
> Using dd(1) to read from the block specials directly works as well and
> as fast as it always has; only reading or writing to mounted filesystems
> is affected.
>
> Box is 32-bit x86, PentiumIII-M; drives are ide using libata.
>
> If the btrfs fs is mounted, the slowdown is enought to trigger the
> hung_task call trace (120s) on the btrfs-transac process.
>
> But the regression is just as apparent when only jfs and ext4 are mounted.
>
> The only filesystems I've found which avoid the regression are tmpfs and
> devtmpfs.
>
> I didn't have time to write up a report when I noticed this in rc7 but
> had to boot back into rc6 for work.
>
> Some of the commits since rc7 looked like they might have addressed this
> regression, but it persists in rc8.
I have created the bug entry at http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15306
for your report.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists