[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1002151433040.1324@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:35:21 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Lubos Lunak <l.lunak@...e.cz>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch -mm 6/9 v2] oom: deprecate oom_adj tunable
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, Alan Cox wrote:
> > /proc/pid/oom_adj is now deprecated so that that it may eventually be
> > removed. The target date for removal is December 2011.
>
> There are systems that rely on this feature. It's ABI, its sacred. We are
> committed to it and it has users. That doesn't really detract from the
> good/bad of the rest of the proposal, it's just one step we can't quite
> make.
>
Andrew suggested that it be deprecated in this way, so that's what was
done. I don't have any strong opinions about leaving it around forever
now that it's otherwise unused beyond simply converting itself into units
for /proc/pid/oom_score_adj at a much higher granularity.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists