[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100216090005.f362f869.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:00:05 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Lubos Lunak <l.lunak@...e.cz>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch -mm 4/9 v2] oom: remove compulsory panic_on_oom mode
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:20:09 -0800 (PST)
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote:
> If /proc/sys/vm/panic_on_oom is set to 2, the kernel will panic
> regardless of whether the memory allocation is constrained by either a
> mempolicy or cpuset.
>
> Since mempolicy-constrained out of memory conditions now iterate through
> the tasklist and select a task to kill, it is possible to panic the
> machine if all tasks sharing the same mempolicy nodes (including those
> with default policy, they may allocate anywhere) or cpuset mems have
> /proc/pid/oom_adj values of OOM_DISABLE. This is functionally equivalent
> to the compulsory panic_on_oom setting of 2, so the mode is removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
NACK. In an enviroment which depends on cluster-fail-over, this is useful
even if in such situation.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists