[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1002161042350.1716-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:44:26 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: "Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
cc: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Matthew Dharm <mdharm-kernel@...-eyed-alien.net>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>,
Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>,
Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Mankad, Maulik Ojas" <x0082077@...com>
Subject: RE: USB mass storage and ARM cache coherency
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> > Your original patch however kills ehci, ohci and uhci on some architectures.
> Well the patch was making _ONLY_ control transfers use PIO and rest of
> the transfer would still use dma. So not sure how much performance impact would
> be because of that.
> Another issue with that patch is there are few controllers which can't do PIO
> at all and hence the patch would broke those controllers.
More than "a few"! None of the EHCI, OHCI, or UHCI controllers used in
Intel-compatible desktop and laptop systems can do PIO. That's what
Oliver meant.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists