[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B7B03E8.40903@cs.helsinki.fi>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:45:28 +0200
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, haicheng.li@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [3/4] SLAB: Set up the l3 lists for the memory of freshly
added memory v2
Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 01:47:29PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
>> On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, Nick Piggin wrote:
>>
>>>>> @@ -1577,6 +1595,8 @@ void __init kmem_cache_init_late(void)
>>>>> */
>>>>> register_cpu_notifier(&cpucache_notifier);
>>>>>
>>>>> + hotplug_memory_notifier(slab_memory_callback, SLAB_CALLBACK_PRI);
>>>>> +
>>>> Only needed for CONFIG_NUMA, but there's no side-effects for UMA kernels
>>>> since status_change_nid will always be -1.
>>> Compiler doesn't know that, though.
>>>
>> Right, setting up a memory hotplug callback for UMA kernels here isn't
>> necessary although slab_node_prepare() would have to be defined
>> unconditionally. I made this suggestion in my review of the patchset's
>> initial version but it was left unchanged, so I'd rather see it included
>> than otherwise stall out. This could always be enclosed in
>> #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA later just like the callback in slub does.
>
> It's not such a big burden to annotate critical core code with such
> things. Otherwise someone else ends up eventually doing it.
Yes, please.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists