[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100217205406.GA13287@twister.home>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:54:06 +0100
From: Gabor Gombas <gombasg@...ikabel.hu>
To: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
Cc: Rudy Zijlstra <rudy@...mpydevil.homelinux.org>,
kyle@...fetthome.net, neilb@...e.de, babydr@...y-dragons.com,
davidsen@....com, volkerarmin@...glemail.com,
mjevans1983@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux mdadm superblock question.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 02:26:46PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> That's simply not true, at least not for Debian. If you actually use the
> distro tools [1] the only assumptions are made at kernel *installation*
> time, not at kernel build time.
And that's why network-booted diskless clients and virtual guests have
all sort of useless modules loaded; the HW where the kernel package was
installed in this case is very different from the HW where the kernel
will run. If only there were a switch to prohibit ever looking at the
current machine's configuration when generating the initramfs...
> I've been using initramfs-tools generated initrds for years without
> problems, and that includes "root on LVM on LUKS encrypted partition"
> and "root on LVM on RAID" setups.
I've tried a couple of times to use a Debian-built initramfs with a
custom built kernel. The kernel worked fine without an initramfs (it had
everything built in), but it did not boot with the initramfs.
Gabor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists