| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1002171317080.4721@asgard.lang.hm> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:17:43 -0800 (PST) From: david@...g.hm To: Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com> cc: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@...glemail.com>, Kyle Moffett <kyle@...fetthome.net>, Rudy Zijlstra <rudy@...mpydevil.homelinux.org>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, "Mr. James W. Laferriere" <babydr@...y-dragons.com>, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>, Michael Evans <mjevans1983@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux mdadm superblock question. On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Nick Bowler wrote: > On 10:41 Wed 17 Feb , david@...g.hm wrote: >> On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Nick Bowler wrote: >>> It takes about half a second for mdadm to assemble my root array, is >>> that what you're referring to? >>> >>> I assume that kernel auto-assembly is no faster, although I've never >>> used it. Regardless, half a second isn't very long to wait. >> >> If you are aiming for a 5-second boot time it's 10% of your total boot >> time. That's a lot for a feature that's not needed. > > Only if the kernel auto-assembly takes zero time, which it obviously > does not. the assembly time would probably be the same, but the initramfs being proposed did not include that time either. David Lang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists