| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20100222143111.GA15778@basil.fritz.box> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:31:11 +0100 From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, haicheng.li@...el.com, rientjes@...gle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] [4/4] SLAB: Fix node add timer race in cache_reap On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:53:27PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote: > Andi Kleen kirjoitti: >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:22:58PM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote: >>> On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, Nick Piggin wrote: >>> >>>> I'm just worried there is still an underlying problem here. >>> So am I. What caused the breakage that requires this patchset? >> >> Memory hotadd with a new node being onlined. > > So can you post the oops, please? Right now I am looking at zapping the I can't post the oops from a pre-release system. > series from slab.git due to NAKs from both Christoph and Nick. Huh? They just complained about the patch, not the whole series. I don't understand how that could prompt you to drop the whole series. As far as I know nobody said the patch is wrong so far, just that they wanted to have more analysis. -Andi -- ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists