[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201002231317.01128.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:17:01 +0100
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Benjamin S." <sbenni@....de>
Subject: Re: [git patch] atang tree: fix 2.6.32 SSD performance regression
On Tuesday 23 February 2010 07:23:24 am Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22 2010, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > DISCLAIMER: the fact of getting patches merged into atang tree means
> > that from now on they will be getting updates for changes happening
> > in atang tree and it should not be treated as an indication regarding
> > decisions taken by 'upstream' kernel trees
> >
> >
> > Fix 2.6.32 regression bringing back the desired SSD performance.
> >
> > [ 'upstream' may want to wait for a proper resolution, for atang tree
> > performance of big non-ATA boxes owned by a very few people is not
> > of such a big concern as a major regression on a commodity hardware ]
>
> What is the point of this, other than continuing your past history of
> political tirades?
I worry that you may be reading too much into it -- I don't use Linus'
tree or linux-next tree any longer so the next kernel I would see fix
for the issue is most likely 2.6.34 and there is a little point from my
personal perspective in waiting for such long time..
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists