linux-kernel - Re: [git patch] atang tree: fix 2.6.32 SSD performance regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100223062324.GI1025@kernel.dk>
Date:	Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:23:24 +0100
From:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Benjamin S." <sbenni@....de>
Subject: Re: [git patch] atang tree: fix 2.6.32 SSD performance regression

On Mon, Feb 22 2010, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> DISCLAIMER: the fact of getting patches merged into atang tree means
> that from now on they will be getting updates for changes happening
> in atang tree and it should not be treated as an indication regarding
> decisions taken by 'upstream' kernel trees
> 
> 
> Fix 2.6.32 regression bringing back the desired SSD performance.
> 
> [ 'upstream' may want to wait for a proper resolution, for atang tree
>   performance of big non-ATA boxes owned by a very few people is not
>   of such a big concern as a major regression on a commodity hardware ]

What is the point of this, other than continuing your past history of
political tirades?

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/