[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1266936254.2723.33.camel@barrios-desktop>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:44:14 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] vmscan: factor out page reference checks
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 15:21 +0100, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Hello Minchan,
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:38:23PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
<snip>
> > >
> > > if (PageDirty(page)) {
> > > - if (sc->order <= PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER && referenced)
> > > + if (references == PAGEREF_RECLAIM_CLEAN)
> >
> > How equal PAGEREF_RECLAIM_CLEAN and sc->order <= PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
> > && referenced by semantic?
>
> It is encoded in page_check_references(). When
> sc->order <= PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER && referenced
> it returns PAGEREF_RECLAIM_CLEAN.
>
> So
>
> - PageDirty() && order < COSTLY && referenced
> + PageDirty() && references == PAGEREF_RECLAIM_CLEAN
>
> is an equivalent transformation. Does this answer your question?
Hmm. I knew it. My point was PAGEREF_RECLAIM_CLEAN seems to be a little
awkward. I thought PAGEREF_RECLAIM_CLEAN means if the page was clean, it
can be reclaimed.
I think it would be better to rename it with represent "Although it's
referenced page recently, we can reclaim it if VM try to reclaim high
order page".
>
> Hannes
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists