linux-kernel - Re: [patch 2/3] vmscan: drop page_mapping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1266936492.2723.36.camel@barrios-desktop>
Date:	Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:48:12 +0900
From:	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] vmscan: drop page_mapping_inuse()

On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 15:32 +0100, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Hello Minchan,
> 
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:03:20PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 20:49 +0100, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > Protecting file pages that are not by themselves mapped but are part
> > > of a mapped file is also a historic leftover for short-lived things
> > 
> > I have been a question in the part.
> > You seem to solve my long question. :)
> > But I want to make sure it by any log.
> > Could you tell me where I find the discussion mail thread or git log at
> > that time?
> 
> I dug up this change in history.git, but unfortunately it was merged
> undocumented in a large changeset.  So there does not seem to be any
> written reason for why this was merged initially.    What I wrote is
> based on what Rik told me on IRC.
> 
> > >  	/* Reclaim if clean, defer dirty pages to writeback */
> > > @@ -1378,7 +1357,7 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_pages, struct zone *zone,
> > >  		}
> > >  
> > >  		/* page_referenced clears PageReferenced */
> > > -		if (page_mapping_inuse(page) &&
> > > +		if (page_mapped(page) &&
> > >  		    page_referenced(page, 0, sc->mem_cgroup, &vm_flags)) {
> > >  			nr_rotated++;
> > >  			/*
> > 
> > It's good to me.
> > But page_referenced already have been checked page_mapped. 
> > How about folding alone page_mapped check into page_referenced's inner?
> 
> The next patch essentially does that.  page_referenced() will no longer
> clear PG_referenced on the page and if page_referenced() is true, it
> means that young ptes were found and the page must thus be mapped.
> 
> So #3 removes the page_mapped() from this conditional.

Thanks! 
I should have reviewed your [3/3] before nitpick. 

> 
> 	Hannes


-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/