[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201002250448.17866.oliver@neukum.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 04:48:17 +0100
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Matthew Dharm <mdharm-kernel@...-eyed-alien.net>,
"Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
"Mankad, Maulik Ojas" <x0082077@...com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>,
Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
"Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: USB mass storage and ARM cache coherency
Am Mittwoch, 24. Februar 2010 22:12:34 schrieb Benjamin Herrenschmidt:
> On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 08:16 +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > I don't know. The issue seems quite complex. It would seem better to
> > centralize it as far as practical. Do you have a wrapper drivers could
> > call?
>
> flush_dcache_page() ? :-)
Will this do anything on arches that don't need it?
Secondly, can we have a wrapper that you can pass a pointer and an
offset?
> Now, the subsystem might be the one to know whether something is mapped
> into userspace or not (v4l in our case) in which case a wrapper could be
> created.
If possible, I'd like to centralize this. Drivers are likely to get this wrong.
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists