linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] mm: Remove ZERO_SIZE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <hm93ia$15p$1@taverner.cs.berkeley.edu>
Date:	Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:23:06 +0000 (UTC)
From:	daw@...berkeley.edu (David Wagner)
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] mm: Remove ZERO_SIZE_PTR.

Tetsuo Handa  wrote:
>This patch simplifies error checks of both callers/callees from
>
>	((unsigned long)(x) <= (unsigned long) 16)
>
>to
>
>	!(x)

I don't follow.  If you want to avoid integer overflow, the caller
of kmalloc() must check to make sure that the arithmetic operations
it performs do not overflow.  That's true whether or not your patch
is accepted.  An integer overflow in an arithmetic operation can yield
a non-zero value, so checking "!(x)" does not guarantee that there was
no integer overflow involved in the computation of x.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/