[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100228011123.GC13594@kryten>
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 12:11:23 +1100
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu, peterz@...radead.org,
awalls@...ix.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com, avi@...hat.com,
johannes@...solutions.net, andi@...stfloor.org, oleg@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] workqueue: concurrency managed workqueue, take#4
Hi Tejun,
I gave the workqueue patches a spin on PowerPC. I'm particularly interested
from an OS jitter perspective, and that these patches wont introduce more
jitter. It looks like we reach a steady state of worker threads and arent
continually creating and destroying them which is good. This could be a big
deal on compute CPUs (CPUs isolated via isol_cpus or cpusets).
A few things I've found so far:
1. NR_CPUS > 32 causes issues with the workqueue debugfs code:
kernel/workqueue.c:3314: warning: left shift count >= width of type
kernel/workqueue.c:3323: warning: left shift count >= width of type
kernel/workqueue.c:3323: warning: integer overflow in expression
kernel/workqueue.c:3324: warning: enumeration values exceed range of largest integer
kernel/workqueue.c: In function ‘wq_debugfs_decode_pos’:
kernel/workqueue.c:3336: warning: right shift count is negative
kernel/workqueue.c:3337: warning: right shift count is negative
kernel/workqueue.c: In function ‘wq_debugfs_next_pos’:
kernel/workqueue.c:3435: warning: left shift count is negative
kernel/workqueue.c:3436: warning: left shift count is negative
kernel/workqueue.c: In function ‘wq_debugfs_start’:
kernel/workqueue.c:3455: warning: left shift count >= width of type
2. cifs needs to be converted:
fs/cifs/cifsfs.c: In function ‘exit_cifs’:
fs/cifs/cifsfs.c:1067: error: ‘system_single_wq’ undeclared (first use in this function)
fs/cifs/cifsfs.c:1067: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
fs/cifs/cifsfs.c:1067: error: for each function it appears in.)
Anton
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists