lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1pr3qcbk1.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date:	Sat, 27 Feb 2010 18:57:02 -0800
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
Cc:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Why does connector use a work queue???


These days netlink callbacks for messages happen in the context of the
process who sent the message.  Things like permission checks are much
more complicated if we don't use that process context.

I was looking at removing NETLINK_CB(skb).eff_cap but I discovered
that connected takes the netlink messages, them from their
perfectly good process context, and puts the into a workqueue
for reasons that are not apparent to me.

Unless I am misreading something we should just be able to remove the
work queues and greatly simplify the connector code.

Something like:

diff --git a/drivers/connector/connector.c b/drivers/connector/connector.c
index 537c29a..4c9af0a 100644
--- a/drivers/connector/connector.c
+++ b/drivers/connector/connector.c
@@ -120,52 +120,28 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cn_netlink_send);
  */
 static int cn_call_callback(struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
-	struct cn_callback_entry *__cbq, *__new_cbq;
+	struct cn_callback_entry *__cbq;
 	struct cn_dev *dev = &cdev;
 	struct cn_msg *msg = NLMSG_DATA(nlmsg_hdr(skb));
 	int err = -ENODEV;
+	void (*callback)(struct cn_msg *req, struct netlink_skb_parms *nsp);
 
+	callback = NULL;
 	spin_lock_bh(&dev->cbdev->queue_lock);
 	list_for_each_entry(__cbq, &dev->cbdev->queue_list, callback_entry) {
 		if (cn_cb_equal(&__cbq->id.id, &msg->id)) {
-			if (likely(!work_pending(&__cbq->work) &&
-					__cbq->data.skb == NULL)) {
-				__cbq->data.skb = skb;
-
-				if (queue_cn_work(__cbq, &__cbq->work))
-					err = 0;
-				else
-					err = -EINVAL;
-			} else {
-				struct cn_callback_data *d;
-
-				err = -ENOMEM;
-				__new_cbq = kzalloc(sizeof(struct cn_callback_entry), GFP_ATOMIC);
-				if (__new_cbq) {
-					d = &__new_cbq->data;
-					d->skb = skb;
-					d->callback = __cbq->data.callback;
-					d->free = __new_cbq;
-
-					__new_cbq->pdev = __cbq->pdev;
-
-					INIT_WORK(&__new_cbq->work,
-							&cn_queue_wrapper);
-
-					if (queue_cn_work(__new_cbq,
-						    &__new_cbq->work))
-						err = 0;
-					else {
-						kfree(__new_cbq);
-						err = -EINVAL;
-					}
-				}
-			}
+			callback = __cbq->data.callback;
+			err = 0;
 			break;
 		}
 	}
 	spin_unlock_bh(&dev->cbdev->queue_lock);
 
+	if (!err) {
+		callback(msg, &NETLINK_CB(skb));
+		kfree_skb(skb);
+	}
+
 	return err;
 }
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ