[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1267442545.11737.20718.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:22:25 +0000
From: Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/irq] x86: apic: Fix mismerge, add
arch_probe_nr_irqs() again
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 10:19 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
>
> for x86, with radix tree based irq_to_desc(),
> removing arch_probe_nr_irqs is intentional. so we get more irq that
> could be used.
This sounds interesting for the Xen dom0 use case where we can have
essentially arbitrary numbers of interrupt sources.
Is there a tree somewhere that I can be looking at?
Ian
--
Ian Campbell
Current Noise: Rammstein - Morgenstern
Money will say more in one moment than the most eloquent lover can in years.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists