linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix atomic64_add

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4B8C068A.4040402@zytor.com>
Date:	Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:25:14 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Luca Barbieri <luca@...a-barbieri.com>
CC:	mingo@...e.hu, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, paulus@...ba.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix atomic64_add_unless return value convention

On 03/01/2010 09:14 AM, Luca Barbieri wrote:
> Return values 0 and 1 were swapped both in the generic implementation and
> my x86-32 one.
> 
> The x86-32 and atomic64_test.c patches should probably be squashed in the
> appropriate commits in tip/x86/atomic

We tend to be very reluctant to do that.

Anyway, please resend your patches with actual patch descriptions
(commit messages).

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/