linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix atomic64_add

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ff13bc9a1003011057s65fab4e5t7c37ebba5af16c9e@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 1 Mar 2010 19:57:45 +0100
From:	Luca Barbieri <luca@...a-barbieri.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, paulus@...ba.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix atomic64_add_unless return value convention

>> The x86-32 and atomic64_test.c patches should probably be squashed in the
>> appropriate commits in tip/x86/atomic
>
> We tend to be very reluctant to do that.
OK: I suggested that to avoid introducing broken commits that could
cause annoyance in bisections.

> Anyway, please resend your patches with actual patch descriptions
> (commit messages).
Resent with more verbose descriptions.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/