[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1003041511070.1305-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 15:22:22 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
cc: Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Weirdness in patch
Greg:
In my copy of gregkh-all-2.6.33.patch (which is dated 2010-03-01),
there are changes to drivers/base/power/main.c, coming from the
gregkh-05-driver-core/driver-core-create-lock-unlock-functions-for-struct-device
patch.
The first weird thing is this. That file as it currently exists on
www.kernel.org (dated 2010-03-03) contains the following hunk (it's the
last hunk for drivers/base/power/main.c):
@@ -962,7 +962,7 @@ static int device_prepare(struct device
suspend_report_result(dev->class->pm->prepare, error);
}
End:
- up(&dev->sem);
+ device_unlock(dev);
return error;
}
But in my copy of gregkh-all-2.6.33.patch, the corresponding hunk is:
@@ -852,7 +852,7 @@
suspend_report_result(dev->class->pm->prepare, error);
}
End:
- up(&dev->sem);
+ device_lock(dev);
return error;
}
The device_unlock() got changed to device_lock()! That messed up my
suspend testing for a while...
Secondly, none of these changes is present in the
gregkh-all-2.6.33.patch file at www.kernel.org. Isn't that supposed to
contain all the patches from the subsystems merged into one?
What's the story?
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists