[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1267734205.16716.4.camel@laptop>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:23:25 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulus@...ba.org,
robert.richter@....com, fweisbec@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 08/11] perf, x86: Implement simple LBR support
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 19:18 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> What is currently implemented is that we loose history at the point a
> new task schedules in an LBR using event.
>
This also matches CPU errata AX14, AJ52 and AAK109 which states that a
task switch may produce faulty LBR state, so clearing history after a
task switch seems the best thing to do.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists