| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20100305.063718.211238119.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 06:37:18 -0800 (PST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk Cc: mingo@...e.hu, skeggsb@...il.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, airlied@...il.com, airlied@...ux.ie, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, dri-devel@...ts.sf.net Subject: Re: [git pull] drm request 3 From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 12:38:34 +0000 >> The conclusion is crystal clear, breaking an ABI via a "flag day" >> cleanup/feature/etc is: > > Ingo go read the staging Kconfig. It's crystal clear, and lots of vendor > junk that is in there being cleaned up it would be *insane* to keep their > old APIs > > See there's a bigger offence than breaking an ABI - its called not RTFM. All of this RTFM and what directory the noveau driver is sitting in is entirely irrelevant Alan. If it effects such a large number of people, which this noveau thing does, it's entirely relevant to everyone. And the way it's breaking and making kernel development difficult for so many people matters to us. It's about the tester base, and this breakage shrinks the tester base considerably. Or do you want the kernel tested by less people? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists