linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Driver core: don't initialize wakeup flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100308220035.GA21390@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 8 Mar 2010 14:00:35 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc:	Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Driver core: don't initialize wakeup flags

On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 04:46:19PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> This patch (as1351) removes an unnecessary and unwanted assignment
> from device_initialize().  The wakeup flags are set to 0 along with
> everything else when the device structure is allocated, so we don't
> need to do it again.  Furthermore, the subsystem might already have
> set these flags to their correct values; we don't want to override it.

Does this solve a bug where a subsystem does do this already?  Or can it
wait for 2.6.35?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/