[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1003081711170.1297-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 17:17:29 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
cc: Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Driver core: don't initialize wakeup flags
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 04:46:19PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > This patch (as1351) removes an unnecessary and unwanted assignment
> > from device_initialize(). The wakeup flags are set to 0 along with
> > everything else when the device structure is allocated, so we don't
> > need to do it again. Furthermore, the subsystem might already have
> > set these flags to their correct values; we don't want to override it.
>
> Does this solve a bug where a subsystem does do this already? Or can it
> wait for 2.6.35?
It does not fix any existing bugs.
On the other hand, I have just submitted a separate patch adding
remote-wakeup support for PNP devices (i8042 keyboard ports in
particular) that depends on this one. If you consider not waking up
from suspend when keys are typed to be a bug, then the two patches
together (plus a third that enables remote wakeup for the keyboard
port by default) would count as a bug fix.
Or to put it differently, I'm waffling. :-)
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists