[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87pr3fd68r.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 09:09:08 +0900
From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Taylor <Daniel.Taylor@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] msdos: add support for large disks
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> writes:
> On 03/07/2010 02:59 AM, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
>> This part is broken. If "size" is smaller than minimum blocksize (note,
>> "size" is number of 512b, not number of blocksize), we can't read any
>> block after all (it is handled as outside of i_size by bdev).
>>
>> Peter (or someone) know what do we want to in here? This is on extended
> > partition itself (e.g. if sda1 sda2<sda5 sda6>, it's the size of sda2)
>
> We should presumably set it to one logical sector, regardless of size.
> Either that, or the offset of the lowest contained partition.
It means,
min(size, max(logical_sector_size / 512, 2));
or like this? ("size" is "nr_sects(part) * (logical_sector_size/512)")
This should keep old logic, i.e. if partition is bigger than 1kb, it
uses 1kb for (probably) LILO mentioned by comment.
>> [BTW, it seems subtypes stuff is not thinking about sector size> 512b...]
>
> Much else isn't, either. With the exception of some MO disks, it was
> nearly unheard of for 20 years.
Yes. So, well, if someone know the spec of those subtypes, let us know.
Thanks.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists