[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1003090733330.9819@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 07:34:41 +0100 (CET)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@....pp.se>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
cc: "linux-ide@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Taylor <Daniel.Taylor@....com>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Mark Lord <kernel@...savvy.com>,
tytso@....edu, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, irtiger@...il.com,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, aschnell@...e.de,
knikanth@...e.de, jdelvare@...e.de
Subject: Re: ATA 4 KiB sector issues.
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Tejun Heo wrote:
> http://ata.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/ATA_4_KiB_sector_issues
Excellent summary.
> C-2. Windows XP depends on the traditional partition layout.
Is this really true? WD ships their EARS drives with an alignment tool
that as far as I can understand, moves the partition so
it's aligned to 4KiB:
http://www.wdc.com/en/products/advancedformat/
So an XP fresh install (including letting XP partition the drive) will be
misaligned, but if you clone xp onto a properly aligned partition (or run
the tool and let it move the partition), it'll be ok. So saying that XP
"depends" on traditional partition layout might be a bit of a streth?
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@....pp.se
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists