linux-kernel - Re: ATA 4 KiB sector issues.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4B95F071.3070400@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Date:	Tue, 09 Mar 2010 09:53:37 +0300
From:	Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
To:	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
CC:	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	"linux-ide@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Daniel Taylor <Daniel.Taylor@....com>,
	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Mark Lord <kernel@...savvy.com>,
	tytso@....edu, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, irtiger@...il.com,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, aschnell@...e.de,
	knikanth@...e.de, jdelvare@...e.de, Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>,
	Jim Meyering <jim@...ering.net>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
Subject: Re: ATA 4 KiB sector issues.

Mike Snitzer wrote:
[]
> I've been keeping track of all the pieces in play, have coordinated
> with kzak and jim, and have a summary that offers some amount of macro
> detail (at the end I touch on parted and fdisk):
> 
> http://people.redhat.com/msnitzer/docs/io-limits.txt

What I don't see in this thread and in this document is - any mention
of linux md layer.  I think it is the first candidate to test the whole
thing, the easiest and most important one.  I mean the alignment and
"recommended I/O size" and all this similar stuff.

Think of a raid5 array - with all the mentioned good stuff in place
fdisk should figure out to align partitions on the array stripe
boundary, and should do that automatically.  And this should be
most easy to debug/test, since the whole thing is controllable
by kernel.

But apparently it does not implement anything of this sort.
Adding Neilb to the Cc list.......

Thanks!

/mjt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/