[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003091109040.28897@router.home>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 11:11:55 -0600 (CST)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
cc: Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] page-allocator: Under memory pressure, wait on
pressure to relieve instead of congestion
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Until it's timeout at least. It's still better than the current
> situation of sleeping on congestion.
Congestion may clear if memory becomes available in other zones.
> The ideal would be waiting on a per-node basis. I'm just not liking having
> to look up the node structure when freeing a patch of pages and making a
> cache line in there unnecessarily hot.
The node structure (pgdat) contains the zone structures. If you know the
type of zone then you can calculate the pgdat address.
> > But then an overallocated node may stall processes. If that node is full
> > of unreclaimable memory then the process may never wake up?
> Processes wake after a timeout.
Ok that limits it but still we may be waiting for no reason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists