lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 9 Mar 2010 17:30:03 +0000
From:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] page-allocator: Under memory pressure, wait on
	pressure to relieve instead of congestion

On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 11:11:55AM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Mel Gorman wrote:
> 
> > Until it's timeout at least. It's still better than the current
> > situation of sleeping on congestion.
> 
> Congestion may clear if memory becomes available in other zones.
> 

I understand that.

> > The ideal would be waiting on a per-node basis. I'm just not liking having
> > to look up the node structure when freeing a patch of pages and making a
> > cache line in there unnecessarily hot.
> 
> The node structure (pgdat) contains the zone structures. If you know the
> type of zone then you can calculate the pgdat address.
> 

I know you can lookup the pgdat from the zone structure. The concern is that
the suggestion requires adding fields to the node structure that then become
hot in the free_page path when the per-cpu lists are being drained. This patch
also adds a hot cache line to the zone but at least it can be eliminated by
using zone->flags. The same optimisation does not apply to working on a
per-node basis.

Adding such a hot line is a big minus and the gain is that processes may
wake up slightly faster when under memory pressure. It's not a good trade-off.

> > > But then an overallocated node may stall processes. If that node is full
> > > of unreclaimable memory then the process may never wake up?
> >
> > Processes wake after a timeout.
> 
> Ok that limits it but still we may be waiting for no reason.
> 

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ