linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] small xhci cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100309183227.GD15974@grease.lan>
Date:	Tue, 9 Mar 2010 11:32:27 -0700
From:	Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] small xhci cleanups

* Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 10:52:43AM -0700, Alex Chiang wrote:
> 
> >       USB: xhci: move all debug code under CONFIG_XHCI_HCD_DEBUGGING
> 
> Does this conflict with Sarah's other debugging patch she just sent out?

I'm assuming you're talking about this patch:

	http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.usb.general/28681

Yes, we'll definitely have conflicts. If you agree that we should
move the debug code under the Kconfig option, then the best
course of action would be for Sarah to rebase her work on top of
my patches (since they're intrusive).

/ac

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/