[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100309184723.GA31374@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 10:47:23 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
Cc: sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] small xhci cleanups
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 11:32:27AM -0700, Alex Chiang wrote:
> * Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>:
> > On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 10:52:43AM -0700, Alex Chiang wrote:
> >
> > > USB: xhci: move all debug code under CONFIG_XHCI_HCD_DEBUGGING
> >
> > Does this conflict with Sarah's other debugging patch she just sent out?
>
> I'm assuming you're talking about this patch:
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.usb.general/28681
Yes.
> Yes, we'll definitely have conflicts. If you agree that we should
> move the debug code under the Kconfig option, then the best
> course of action would be for Sarah to rebase her work on top of
> my patches (since they're intrusive).
As Sarah is the maintainer of the file, I'll leave that decision up to
her :)
And keeping a config option for debugging isn't a good idea. The rest
of the kernel has switched to using dynamic debugging, so that distros
and others can easily get information without requiring a kernel rebuild
(which we can't expect users to always be able to do.) So I would not
recommend this change.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists