[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201003092256.39223.dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 22:56:38 -0800
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
Cc: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@...oscopio.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, John Kacur <jkacur@...il.com>,
jkosina@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] input: use input_mutex instead of BKL when opening input device
On Tuesday 09 March 2010 10:49:20 pm Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 10. März 2010 07:20:15 schrieb Dmitry Torokhov:
> > > I was willing to let the open call go unprotected. But ended up
> > > checking that the three callees were fine (they do not call any of the
> > > other functions that take the mutex).
> > >
> > > Since the fops_put/fops_get do protect that section from the handler
> > > removal and I can't think of any other race right now, I think your
> > > version is really better.
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@...oscopio.com>
> >
> > OK, applied 2 Thadeu's patches and one Arnd's.
>
> Jiri,
>
> it is possible that this requires a change in usbhid as it uses BKL.
> Do you remember?
>
No, different layer altogether.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists