[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201003100749.20723.oliver@neukum.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:49:20 +0100
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@...oscopio.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, John Kacur <jkacur@...il.com>,
jkosina@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] input: use input_mutex instead of BKL when opening input device
Am Mittwoch, 10. März 2010 07:20:15 schrieb Dmitry Torokhov:
> > I was willing to let the open call go unprotected. But ended up checking
> > that the three callees were fine (they do not call any of the other
> > functions that take the mutex).
> >
> > Since the fops_put/fops_get do protect that section from the handler
> > removal and I can't think of any other race right now, I think your
> > version is really better.
> >
> > Acked-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@...oscopio.com>
> >
>
> OK, applied 2 Thadeu's patches and one Arnd's.
Jiri,
it is possible that this requires a change in usbhid as it uses BKL.
Do you remember?
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists