[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1268258838.21103.6.camel@concordia>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:07:18 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
To: ijc@...lion.org.uk
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irq: move some interrupt arch_* functions into struct
irq_chip.
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 10:55 +0000, ijc@...lion.org.uk wrote:
> From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
>
> Move arch_init_copy_chip_data and arch_free_chip_data into function
> pointers in struct irq_chip since they operate on irq_desc->chip_data.
>
> arch_init_chip_data cannot be moved into struct irq_chip at this time
> because irq_desc->chip is not known at the time the irq_desc is
> setup. For now rename arch_init_chip_data to arch_init_irq_desc (for
> PowerPC, the only other user, whose usage better matches the new name)
> and on x86 convert arch_init_chip_data to ioapic_init_chip_data and
> call this whenever the IO APIC code allocates a new IRQ.
Ack on the name change, it should be called arch_init_irq_desc(), the
existing name clearly comes from the fact that sparse IRQ was
implemented first on x86, and on x86 that routine init's the chip data
for a new irq_desc.
But semantically arch_init_irq_desc() is the right name, I was just too
lazy to change it when I enabled sparse IRQ for powerpc.
Can't comment on the rest of the patch.
cheers
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists