[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100310041037.GC17693@linux-sh.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:10:37 +0900
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: Magnus Damm <damm@...nsource.se>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: Early dev_name() support.
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 07:28:46PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:21:58PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 06:37:27PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 03:57:53PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > > > Presently early platform devices suffer from the fact they are unable to
> > > > use dev_xxx() calls early on due to dev_name() and others being
> > > > unavailable at the time ->probe() is called.
> > > >
> > > > This implements early init_name construction from the matched name/id
> > > > pair following the semantics of the late device/driver match. As a
> > > > result, matched IDs (inclusive of requested ones) are preserved when the
> > > > handoff from the early platform code happens at kobject initialization
> > > > time.
> > > >
> > > > Since we still require kmalloc slabs to be available at this point, using
> > > > kstrdup() for establishing the init_name works fine. This subsequently
> > > > needs to be tested from dev_name() prior to the init_name being cleared
> > > > by the driver core. We don't kfree() since others will already have a
> > > > handle on the string long before the kobject initialization takes place.
> > > >
> > > > This is also needed to permit drivers to use the clock framework early,
> > > > without having to manually construct their own device IDs from the match
> > > > id/name pair locally (needed by the early console and timer code on sh
> > > > and arm).
> > >
> > > Is this change something that we need for .34? Or can it wait for .35?
> > >
> > If it went in for .34 we would get properly dev_name() resolution in the
> > error paths for the existing early platform drivers, but that's obviously
> > not critical.
> >
> > I have a bunch of work I plan to do on top of it for 2.6.35, so I was
> > planning on carrying it in a topic branch once I got your Acked-by.
>
> Sure, that's fine with me. Feel free to add a:
> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
>
> to the patch.
>
Done, thanks Greg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists