linux-kernel - Re: [patch] x86: increase CONFIG_NODES

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100311181832.GB12235@elte.hu>
Date:	Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:18:32 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: increase CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT max to 10


* Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 03:15:33PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:
> > 
> > > > erm. Alas I cannot merge it in the x86 tree without that fix being 
> > > > upstream. Why for v2.6.35 - shouldnt that be v2.6.34?
> > > 
> > > If it needs to go in before .35, or it should go through Ingo's trees, I 
> > > have no objection.
> > 
> > It does not 'need' to be in .34 but if the fix is trivial enough then you 
> > could give it a try?
> 
> The fix is trivial, I'll queue it up.

Thanks Greg!

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/