linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] devtmpfs: support !CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:38:08 +0100
From:	Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>
To:	Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
Cc:	kay.sievers@...y.org, gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] devtmpfs: support !CONFIG_TMPFS

>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru> writes:

Hi,

 >> +#ifdef CONFIG_TMPFS
 >> return get_sb_single(fs_type, flags, data, shmem_fill_super, mnt);
 >> +#else
 >> +	return get_sb_single(fs_type, flags, data, ramfs_fill_super, mnt);
 >> +#endif
 >> }

 Michael> May be completely not to the point or even wrong, but I were
 Michael> starring at this change for quite some time trying to understand
 Michael> what's the difference.  Can we do it like this:

 Michael> #ifdef CONFIG_TMPFS
 Michael> # define devtmpfs_fill_super shmem_fill_super
 Michael> #else
 Michael> # define devtmpfs_fill_super ramfs_fill_super
 Michael> #endif
 Michael>   	return get_sb_single(fs_type, flags, data, devtmpfs_fill_super, mnt);

 Michael> ?

Sure, if people find that cleaner - Kay?

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/