[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ac3eb2511003120502y2953ff0au81ee5c4d76261a87@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:02:57 +0100
From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
To: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>
Cc: Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>, gregkh@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] devtmpfs: support !CONFIG_TMPFS
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:38, Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk> wrote:
>>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru> writes:
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_TMPFS
> >> return get_sb_single(fs_type, flags, data, shmem_fill_super, mnt);
> >> +#else
> >> + return get_sb_single(fs_type, flags, data, ramfs_fill_super, mnt);
> >> +#endif
> >> }
>
> Michael> May be completely not to the point or even wrong, but I were
> Michael> starring at this change for quite some time trying to understand
> Michael> what's the difference. Can we do it like this:
>
> Michael> #ifdef CONFIG_TMPFS
> Michael> # define devtmpfs_fill_super shmem_fill_super
> Michael> #else
> Michael> # define devtmpfs_fill_super ramfs_fill_super
> Michael> #endif
> Michael> return get_sb_single(fs_type, flags, data, devtmpfs_fill_super, mnt);
> Sure, if people find that cleaner - Kay?
For the style:
I would prefer your original version.
For the patch:
Acked-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Thanks,
Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists