lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:14:23 -0500
From:	Andrew Morton <>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <>
Cc:	LKML <>, Ingo Molnar <>,,,,,,,, John Stultz <>,,,
	Rusty Russell <>,
	Greg KH <>, David Miller <>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] genirq: warn about IRQF_SHARED|IRQF_DISABLED at the
 right place

On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 01:59:50 +0100 (CET) Thomas Gleixner <> wrote:

> I'm simply refusing to apply patches which just shuffle code around to
> warn about obscure use cases instead of tackling the real problem of
> long running irq handlers which prevent us to get rid of IRQF_DISABLED
> and just run all interrupt handlers with irqs disabled.

I'm having trouble agreeing with that aim, really.

We can tweak and tune until we're blue in the face, but the system's
IRQ latency will always be worse if handlers always run with interrupts

Plus this approach introduces dependencies between unrelated drivers
(and between _each_ driver and the overall system) which simply don't
exist if those drivers are being nicer to the rest of the system.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists