[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100316094611.GG7961@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:46:11 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: acme@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
fweisbec@...il.com, efault@....de, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
paulus@...ba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf top: Properly notify the user that vmlinux is
missing
* David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
> Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:21:26 -0300
>
> > Em Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:55:26AM -0700, David Miller escreveu:
> >> Arnaldo, if perf top can use the kallsyms to do it's normal task, why
> >> can't it use that for symbol annotations too? Isn't there enough
> >> information available?
> >
> > Annotation is done by objdump -dS, that requires an executable file to do
> > ASM annotation, and one with DWARF info for source code annotation. What
> > we have with /proc/kallsyms is just the symtab.
>
> Ok, I really think we should link with libopcodes or similar so we can
> handle the simple assembler annotation case without requiring the kernel
> image being available.
>
> That's what I was trying to achieve when I sent you the report
> :-)
i'd really like that to happen - i.e. if we had the kernel (and modules) image
exposed as a (almost-)standard ELF object via /sys or so.
We already have some aspects of that, via /sys/kernel/notes, but it should be
done for real. That would also make build-id support less of a hack.
( I'd not include CFI debuginfo in there though - that would be way too large.
More compressed debuginfo could be included perhaps. )
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists