[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1268762160.25503.2988.camel@calx>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:56:00 -0500
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Borkmann <danborkmann@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] NET: netpoll, fix potential NULL ptr dereference
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 18:22 +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 03/16/2010 06:12 PM, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > I don't get it. The source of the branch tests for !ndev->npinfo and the
> > original destination of the branch also tests for !ndev->npinfo. I don't
> > see how it gets dereferenced.
>
> Let's look at more of the context:
> if (!ndev->npinfo) {
> npinfo = kmalloc(sizeof(*npinfo), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!npinfo) { // npinfo is NULL
> err = -ENOMEM;
> goto release;
> }
> ...
> release: // npinfo is still NULL
> if (!ndev->npinfo) { // condition is the same (holds)
> // dereference below: vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
> spin_lock_irqsave(&npinfo->rx_lock, flags);
> list_for_each_entry_safe(npe, tmp, &npinfo->rx_np, rx) {
> npe->dev = NULL;
> }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&npinfo->rx_lock, flags);
>
> kfree(npinfo);
> }
Ok, you're correct, I read the second test backwards.
Acked-by: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
--
http://selenic.com : development and support for Mercurial and Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists