lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003171134070.27268@router.home>
Date:	Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:34:40 -0500 (CDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] remove implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h

On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Tejun Heo wrote:

> Hello,
>
> On 03/17/2010 01:16 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >
> >> Lee Schermerhorn was trying to use percpu from slab.h and ran into a
> >> dependency loop.  percpu.h was using slab.h for UP inline
> >
> > Did something change there or does the description need an update?
>
> I don't find anything too wrong about the description?

"Lee Schermerhorn nwas trying to use percpu from slab.h and ..."

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ