| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1268846083.4773.64.camel@useless.americas.hpqcorp.net> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:14:43 -0400 From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com> To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [RFC] remove implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 11:34 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > On 03/17/2010 01:16 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > > > >> Lee Schermerhorn was trying to use percpu from slab.h and ran into a > > >> dependency loop. percpu.h was using slab.h for UP inline > > > > > > Did something change there or does the description need an update? > > > > I don't find anything too wrong about the description? > > "Lee Schermerhorn nwas trying to use percpu from slab.h and ..." Well, indirectly, I was including percpu.h in slab.h by way of gpf.h/topology.h. Not actually what I was *trying* to do. s/from slab.h/from topology.h/ is the update Christoph is indicating. Right, Christoph? > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists